We’re delighted to be supporting the team of leading sleep researchers from the British Sleep Society (BSS) who have called for the government to abolish the twice yearly clock changes in the UK due to the adverse effects on sleep and circadian health.
The BSS emphasises that sleep is central to health and well-being and the enforced changes of clock time to Daylight Saving Time can interfere negatively with sleep regulation.
The statement which has been published in the Journal of Sleep Research is co-authored by researchers at the University’s of Strathclyde, Surrey, Edinburgh, Warwick and Lincoln, Imperial College London, King’s College London and Northumbria.
Dr Megan Crawford, of the Strathclyde Centre for Sleep Health, said: “Discussions around abolishing the twice-yearly clock change keep emerging; alarmingly some want to replace it with Daylight Saving Time all year round. Other sleep societies have argued against this and the return to all year-round Standard Time, but there is currently no published UK perspective. The unique location and orientation of our UK landmass needs to be considered because permanent DST would over-disadvantage people west and north of London.”
Dr Eva Winnebeck, of the University of Surrey, said: “What we often don’t realise is that Daylight Saving Time changes our schedules, moving them forward by one hour while daylight remains the same. DST forces us all to get up and go to work or school one hour earlier. In seasons with fewer daylight hours such as now in autumn, it means most of us have to get up and commute in the dark.”
The BSS states that natural daylight in the morning is crucial for maintaining an optimal alignment of our body clocks with day and night, which is essential for optimal sleep and overall health.
“Some people even advocate switching to Daylight Saving Time all year around, but we consider this a misguided idea,” said Professor Malcolm von Schantz of Northumbria University.
“Mornings are the time when our body clocks have the greatest need for light to stay in synch. At our latitudes, there simply is no spare daylight to save during the winter months and given the choice between natural light in the morning and natural light in the afternoon, the scientific evidence favours light in the morning.”
The position statement highlights the potential risks of adopting permanent DST, which include depriving the UK population of essential morning light, particularly during the winter months. This lack of morning light could lead to significant disruptions in sleep patterns and circadian rhythms, with potential long-term health consequences.